Sir namma villege Alli kudiyuva neeru sarabaraju maduvvaru retired aggidhare aada Kaarana kudiyuva meeting samsya thumba jasti ide please reply Maadi idara bagge. Ty you so much sir Nanu Panchayat Raj book online nalli hudukuta edde, but adu engliEn varision nalle sigta ettu. But adu ega nimminda Kannada dalli sikkide.
|Published (Last):||10 July 2006|
|PDF File Size:||18.12 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
You can change your ad preferences anytime. Upcoming SlideShare. Like this document? Why not share! Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Revappa Khyadi Follow. Published in: Education.
Full Name Comment goes here. Are you sure you want to Yes No. An eBook reader can be a software application for use on a computer such as Microsoft's free Reader application, or a book-sized computer THE is used solely as a reading device such as Nuvomedia's Rocket eBook. Users can purchase an eBook on diskette or CD, but the most popular method of getting an eBook is to purchase a downloadable file of the eBook or other reading material from a Web site such as Barnes and Noble to be read from the user's computer or reading device.
Generally, an eBook can be downloaded in five minutes or less An eBook reader can be a software application for use on a computer such as Microsoft's free Reader application, or a book-sized computer THIS is used solely as a reading device such as Nuvomedia's Rocket eBook. Browse by Genre Available eBooks Show More. Vikram Avhad. Megha R , Student at visveswaraia technological university. No Downloads. Views Total views. Actions Shares. Embeds 0 No embeds. No notes for slide. Constitution Amendment to Article 73 and Article History of Karnataka Panchayat Raj3.
Total Sanitation Campaign9. Early historyDuring the time of the Rig-Veda BC , evidences suggest that self-governingvillage bodies called sabhas existed. With the passage of time, these bodies becamepanchayats council of five persons.
Panchayats were functional institutions ofgrassroots governance in almost every village. The Village Panchayat or elected councilhad large powers, both executive and judicial. Land was distributed by this panchayatwhich also collected taxes out of the produce and paid the governments share onbehalf of the village. Above a number of these village councils there was a largerpanchayat or council to supervise and interfere if necessary .
Casteism and feudalisticsystem of governance under Mughal rule in the medieval period slowly eroded the self-government in villages. A new class of feudal chiefs and revenue collectors zamindars emerged between the ruler and the people. And, so began the stagnation and decline ofself-government in villages.
During the British rule, the autonomy of panchayatsgradually declined with the establishment of local civil and criminal courts, revenue andpolice organisations, the increase in communications, the growth of individualism andthe operation of the individual Ryotwari landholder-wise system as against theMahalwari or village tenure system.
During British ruleThe panchayat had never been the priority of the British rulers . The rulers wereinterested in the creation of controlled local bodies, which could help them in theirtrading interests by collecting taxes for them.
When the colonial administration cameunder severe financial pressure after the uprising, the remedy sought wasdecentralisation in terms of transferring responsibility for road and public works to localbodies.
However, the thrust of this compelled decentralisation was with respect tomunicipal administration. Itwas a landmark in the evolution of colonial policy towards local government. The realbenchmarking of the government policy on decentralisation can, however, be attributedto Lord Ripon who, in his famous resolution on local self-government on May 18, ,recognised the twin considerations of local government: i administrative efficiency and ii political education.
This resolution met with resistance from colonialadministrators. The progress of local self-government was tardy with only half-heartedsteps taken in setting up municipal bodies. Rural decentralisation remained a neglectedarea of administrative reform.
The Royal Commission on Decentralisation under the chairmanship of C. Hobhouse recognised the importance of panchayats at the village level.
Thecommission recommended that "it is most desirable, alike in the interests ofdecentralisation and in order to associate the people with the local tasks ofadministration, that an attempt should be made to constitute and develop villagepanchayats for the administration of local village affairs". Due to organisational and fiscal constraints, the reform was unable to make panchayatinstitutions truly democratic and vibrant. However, the most significant development ofthis period was the establishment of village panchayats in a number of provinces, thatwere no longer mere ad hoc judicial tribunal, but representative institutions symbolisingthe corporate character of the village and having a wide jurisdiction in respect of civicmatters.
The provincial autonomy under the Government of India Act, , marked theevolution of panchayats in India. Popularly elected governments in provinces enactedlegislations to further democratise institutions of local self-government. But the systemof responsible government at the grassroots level was least responsible. Mishra,the then minister for local self-government under the Government of India Act of inCentral Provinces was of the view that the working of our local bodies Inefficiency and localbody have become synonymous terms In spite of various committees such as the Royal Commission on Decentralization , the report of Montague and Chemsford on constitutional reform , theGovernment of India Resolution , etc.
The administrator became the focal point ofrural governance. The British were not concerned with decentralised democracy butwere aiming for colonial objectives. The Indian National Congress from the s to , emphasized the issue of all-IndiaSwaraj, and organized movements for Independence under the leadership of MahatmaGandhi.
The task of preparing any sort of blueprint for the local level was neglected as aresult. There was no consensus among the top leaders regarding the status and role tobe assigned to the institution of rural local self-government; rather there were divergentviews on the subject.
On the one end Gandhi favoured Village Swaraj andstrengthening the village panchayat to the fullest extent and on the other end, Dr. Ambedkar opposed this idea. He believed that the village represented regressive India,a source of oppression. The model state hence had to build safeguards against suchsocial oppression and the only way it could be done was through the adoption of theparliamentary model of politics  During the drafting of the Constitution of India,Panchayati Raj Institutions were placed in the non-justiciable part of the Constitution,the Directive Principles of State Policy, as Article The Article read the State shalltake steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers andauthority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.
However, no worthwhile legislation was enacted either at the national or state level toimplement it. In the four decades since the adoption of the Constitution, panchayat raj institutionshave travelled from the non-justiciable part of the Constitution to one where, through aseparate amendment, a whole new status has been added to their history Post-independence periodPanchayat raj had to go through various stages. The First Five Year Plan failed to bringabout active participation and involvement of the people in the Plan processes, whichincluded Plan formulation implementation and monitoring.
The Second Five Year Planattempted to cover the entire countryside with National Extensive Service Blocksthrough the institutions of Block Development Officers, Assistant Development Officers,Village Level Workers, in addition to nominated representatives of village panchayats ofthat area and some other popular organisations like co-operative societies. But the planfailed to satisfactorily accomplish decentralisation.
Hence, committees were constitutedby various authorities to advise the Centre on different aspects of decentralisation. The Balwantrai Mehta Committee In , Balwantrai Mehta Committee studied the Community Development Projectsand the National Extension Service and assessed the extent to which the movementhad succeeded in utilising local initiatives and in creating institutions to ensure continuityin the process of improving economic and social conditions in rural areas.
TheCommittee held that community development would only be deep and enduring whenthe community was involved in the planning, decision-making and implementationprocess . The PRI structure did not develop the requisite democratic momentum and failed tocater to the needs of rural development. There are various reasons for such an outcomewhich include political and bureaucratic resistance at the state level to share power andresources with local level institutions, domination of local elites over the major share ofthe benefits of welfare schemes, lack of capability at the local level and lack of politicalwill.
Santhanam Committee One of the prime areas of concern in this long debate on panchayati raj institutions wasfiscal decentralisation. The K. Santhanam Committee was appointed to look solely atthe issue of PRI finance, in The fiscal capacity of PRIs tends to be limited, as richresources of revenue are pre-empted by higher levels of government, and issue is stilldebated today. The Committee was asked to determine issues related to sanctioning ofgrants to PRIs by the state government, evolving mutual financial relations between thethree tiers of PRIs, gifts and donation, handing over revenue in full or part to PRIs.
These issues have been debated over the last three decades and have been taken upby the State Finance Commissions which are required to select taxes for assignmentand sharing, identifying the principles for such sharing and assignment, determine thelevel of grants and recommend the final distribution of states transfers to localauthorities.
The Committee had to evolve an effectivedecentralised system of development for PRIs. However, the flux in politics at the state level did not allow theseinstitutions to develop their own political dynamics.
Rao Committee The G. Rao Committee was appointed to once again look at various aspects ofPRIs. Singhvi Committee studied panchayatiraj. The Gram Sabha was considered as thebase of a decentralised democracy, and PRIs viewed as institutions of self-governancewhich would actually facilitate the participation of the people in the process of planningand development.
Karnataka Panchayat Raj
Though the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act has made a five-year term mandatory for zilla panchayat president and vice-president, efforts are on to force the current Dakshina Kannada DK ZP president and vice president to step down. The five-year term of the zilla panchayat, taluk panchayat, and gram panchayat president and vice-presidents were fixed after bringing in an amendment to Section 46 Gram Panchayat , Taluk Panchayat and Zilla panchayat of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, The Deputy Commissioner shall also inquire after receipt of a complaint that the resignation is submitted under threat, coercion, undue influence and allurement and is not submitted voluntarily. He shall not accept such resignation in such a case. As per the Act, the vice president will submit a resignation to the president and the president will submit resignation to the government.
the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993
The Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department conducts exams to recruit candidates for the service. Substituted by Act 44 of w. Section B Constitution of the Karnataka Panchayat Administrative Service, — The Government shall constitute a Karnataka panchayat administrative service consisting of such category of posts from the rural development and panchayat raj department, the number of posts, scale of pay, method of recruitment and minimum qualifications shall be such as may be prescribed]1 1. Inserted by Act 44 of w. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is an orphan , as no other articles link to it.
Karnataka Panchayat Administrative Service
The Panchayats are among the oldest institutions for local governance in rural Karnataka. This long standing system of local governance is also known as Panchayat Raj which means rule of village committee. Panchayat Raj ensures proper execution of rural development programmes. It encourages participation of general people in the development programmes. Panchayat Raj in Karnataka follows a three tier structural constitution. It has elected bodies at each level. Panchayat Raj constitutes of:.
Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act 1993 Download